08.
The Partners
Comparable work and references. Disclosures. Response checklist
COMPARABLE WORK
Stated exactly as performed. Verifiable with any client named.
Freedom’s role on each engagement is described as it actually was. The contracting authority may verify authorship directly.
| THE WORK | FREEDOM’S ROLE | WHY IT IS RELEVANT HERE | |
|---|---|---|---|
Red Sea Global |
AMAALA and Marina branding, RSGH hotel branding, Visit Red Sea digital platform, HotelCo brand DNA workshop |
Brand strategy and identity |
A master brand across operating companies, with claims about an unbuilt destination substantiated before publication |
United Al Saqer |
Group brand strategy and identity across operating companies |
Brand strategy and identity |
Group brand holding across separate mandates |
MBC Group |
Shahid brand architecture strategy |
Brand architecture strategy |
Architecture and endorsement under one parent |
Alshaya, Aura |
Membership platform spanning multiple retail brands under one parent, campaigns and retainer |
Brand and campaign |
Multi-brand governance at scale |
Kitopi |
Branding |
Brand strategy and identity |
Regional scale-up, founder audience |
Dubai Future Foundation, Museum of the Future |
Fashion retail strategy, NAS Future Foundation |
Strategy and production |
Government and institutional stakeholders |
Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre, 2117 |
Brand strategy, identity and world-building for a semi-government metaverse initiative |
Brand strategy and identity |
A government-backed initiative with a world to build before it had a public, launched on an idea rather than a track record |
Referees: Joelle Hadfield, Red Sea Global. Mohamad Ballout, Kitopi. Grégoire Charpe-Civatte, Al Tayer Group. Contact details in the eligibility pack. Four case studies and their work follow.
COMPARABLE WORK. RED SEA GLOBAL
A master brand for a place that did not yet exist.
Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coast developer, owned by the Public Investment Fund. Destinations, hotel brands and a visitor platform, each needing its own identity under one parent, before any of it was built.
Brand work for AMAALA, the Marina, the RSGH hotel group and the Visit Red Sea platform ran ahead of construction. Every claim about a place, a hotel or an experience had to be substantiated before publication, across entities with separate mandates.
The discipline the Thara scope demands: nothing implied before the documents exist
Brand strategy and identity for AMAALA and the Marina. Hotel branding for RSGH. The full brand identity and visual language for Visit Red Sea, positioning it as the destination hub for experiences, resorts, residences and private retreats: a brand that invites exploration while staying grounded in considered elegance. A brand DNA workshop for HotelCo.
Several entities, one system, one approval route
Brand strategy and identity across four Red Sea Global brands. Campaign and content production on later engagements, including the Visit the Red Sea campaign and manifesto.
Delivered, and continuing
Identities and guidelines in use across the destination’s properties and platform, with Red Sea Global holding every source file.
Client-held, not agency-held
A government-backed developer launching several entities under one brand, with the proof arriving after the promise. Thara’s structure, in another sector.
Referee: Joelle Hadfield, Director of Brand Strategy and Development
Freedom’s role is stated exactly as performed. The contracting authority may verify it with the client.
COMPARABLE WORK. KITOPI
Rebranded for the move from kitchens to customers.
Dubai-founded, venture-backed, one of the region’s food technology unicorns. Six years after launch, moving from a cloud-kitchen model to launching brands, acquiring restaurants and serving customers directly.
A brand built for a B2B operating model had to carry a consumer-facing future: new brands, acquired restaurants and direct relationships with diners, without losing the partners and employees it already served. Kitopi needed to rethink its brand identity and narrative to make the transition to D2C.
Growth that outran the identity
A new positioning as the leading creator and partner for boundless food experiences, told as an emotional brand story across customer, employee and partner interactions. An endorsement scale defining the relationship between Kitopi and each brand it creates or acquires. A manifesto, a distinct persona and an identity anchored in the endless creation of joyful food experiences.
Brand strategy, architecture and identity
Brand strategy and identity, including the architecture and the endorsement system. Packaging and a campaign platform followed.
Delivered
A brand system built to scale with the business through its next growth phase, with Kitopi holding the source files.
In market
A regional founder’s company at the moment of scale, with an endorsement architecture for the brands beneath it. The founders Thara exists to produce, and the architecture problem Thara has.
Referee: Mohamad Ballout, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer
Freedom’s role is stated exactly as performed. The contracting authority may verify it with the client.
COMPARABLE WORK. AURA, ALSHAYA GROUP
From a loyalty programme to a loyalty ecosystem.
Alshaya Group’s loyalty programme across more than 75 global retail and food brands, with over a million members in its first year.
A brand architecture built for a single earn-and-burn loyalty product could not support what was coming next: new verticals, new partnerships and a growing ecosystem of value propositions beyond traditional loyalty, across dozens of brands under one parent.
One identity, many brands, more coming
Repositioned Aura from a loyalty programme to an ecosystem offering access to Alshaya’s brands. A flexible identity architecture holding Aura as master brand, with Aura Card and Aura Mobile as distinct products, applied across product surfaces and communications from the same visual source. A communication strategy across the customer funnel.
Brand refresh, architecture, communication system
Brand strategy, identity architecture and campaign platforms, then a continuing retainer across campaigns, CRM content, localisation and production.
Delivered, and continuing
A scalable system giving Aura the architecture to grow without fragmenting the visual language or diluting the master brand, extended since across categories and partner brands.
Retainer running
A master brand over many entities, governed from one source, extended by people who are not the agency. The governance Thara’s six entities will need.
Corporate, UAE and GCC
Freedom’s role is stated exactly as performed. The contracting authority may verify it with the client.
COMPARABLE WORK. DUBAI FUTURE FOUNDATION
A fashion brand built from the Museum’s own story.
The Museum of the Future, operated by Dubai Future Foundation, extending into fashion retail: a collection that had to carry the Museum’s values rather than its logo.
Museum retail usually sells the building on a T-shirt. The brief was a fashion brand in its own right, grounded in the Museum’s story, with each garment able to show where it came from.
Government institution, commercial brand
Fashion retail brand strategy for the Museum of the Future, then the identity: wordmarks, lockups and a standalone symbol for the collection. For the Core Collection, a product identification system connecting each garment to the Museum’s story and values. Scanning unlocks material breakdowns, provenance and care guidance, grounding essentials in transparency.
Strategy, identity and a provenance system
Strategic advisory and brand identity. Strategy delivered, identity shipped.
Delivered
A brand and a system the Museum’s team operates, with provenance built into the product rather than claimed in the copy.
Client-held
A UAE government institution with a commercial brand beneath it, and proof designed into the product. The institutional register Thara needs, with claims substantiated by design.
Government, UAE
Freedom’s role is stated exactly as performed. The contracting authority may verify it with the client.
Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre, 2117
MBC Group
DISCLOSURES
Declared, not discovered.
Everything the submission rules require to be stated, stated. Silence would be treated as inclusion.
Action Global Communications for the press office and Arabic editorial. The web development team, managed by Freedom, is named at mobilisation and confirmed at contract signature.
A partner management fee is disclosed as a separate line in the financial file. No other mark-up, rebate or commission applies
Freedom holds no engagement with any directly competing ecosystem.
Wamda Capital is declared as an existing relationship and introduction route only, with no engagement and no guarantee of participation
AI-assisted production is used for adaptation and versioning after master creative approval.
No AI output is published without human review, rights checks and approval. AI use is recorded in the asset register
Work is conducted primarily in the UAE, with attendance at Ajman meetings, production, events and stakeholder sessions as required.
Freedom Studio FZE LLC holds a valid UAE commercial licence covering the proposed activities
Registered as a supplier on the Ajman Government Tenders Portal. Professional indemnity cover in place.
A signed undertaking confirming ability to provide the required bank guarantee accompanies this bid
Any qualification to this proposal appears here or in the assumptions. General terms and later correspondence do not override the tender requirements.
SCHEDULE I. BIDDER RESPONSE CHECKLIST
Every requirement, and where it is answered.
Each item of the bidder response checklist, its compliance status and where this proposal answers it. Slide numbers follow the order of this document.
| COMPLIANCE | WHERE IT IS ANSWERED | NOTE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01. Understanding of Thara as an integrated independent ecosystem | Comply | Slides 2, 8 to 15 | |
| 02. Understanding of all six entities and their audiences | Comply | Slides 15, 57, 60, 61 | |
| 03. Validation and research methodology | Comply | Slide 17 | |
| 04. Brand strategy, narrative and evidence approach | Comply | Slides 8 to 17 | |
| 05. Architecture and naming approach | Comply | Slides 57, 58 | Final transliteration is a Phase 2 deliverable |
| 06. Arabic and English capability with named senior practitioners | Comply | Slides 56, 64, 84 | Arabic editorial lead named |
| 07. Visual identity and application scope | Comply | Slides 19 to 31, 58 | Thirteen application categories |
Items 8 to 28 follow on the next three slides. | |||
| SCHEDULE I, CONTINUEDItems 8 to 14.Bidder response checklist, continued. | |||
| 08. Website architecture, functions, technology and client control | Comply | Slides 86 to 95 | |
| 09. Accessibility, privacy, cyber security and performance approach | Comply | Slide 93 | WCAG 2.2 AA, Core Web Vitals at launch |
| 10. Launch strategy, asset plan and critical-path response | Comply | Slides 5, 32 to 50, 66, 67 | Two-stage launch proposed |
| 11. PR, media office, spokesperson and crisis service model | Comply | Slides 74 to 84 | Worked crisis scenario at slide 88 |
| 12. Optional social-management proposal, if submitted | Not applicable | Package 1 only. Package 2 not submitted | |
| 13. Social channel architecture and editorial system, if Package 2 | Not applicable | Package 2 not submitted | |
| 14. Content capacity, quality and rights | Comply | Slides 48, 49, 71, 72, 97 | |
Items 15 to 28 follow. | |||
| SCHEDULE I, CONTINUEDItems 15 to 21.Bidder response checklist, continued. | |||
| 15. Community management and service levels, if Package 2 | Not applicable | Package 2 not submitted | |
| 16. Paid-media planning, access, optimisation and fee model | Not applicable | Package 2 not submitted | |
| 17. Measurement framework, KPI definitions and raw-data handover | Comply | Slides 59, 94, 96 | KPI dictionary approved before launch |
| 18. Governance, approval, risk and change-control model | Comply | Slides 62, 63, 69, 73 | |
| 19. Named team, availability, location and subcontractors | Comply | Slides 64, 84, 97, 135 | |
| 20. Detailed programme with dependencies and client decisions | Comply | Slides 66, 67, 69 | Phases, gates, dependencies and the six client responsibilities |
| 21. Value creation, 100 days, measures, proof | Comply | Slides 71, 72 | VC-01 to VC-04 |
Items 22 to 28 follow. | |||
| SCHEDULE I, CONTINUEDItems 22 to 28.Bidder response checklist, continued. | |||
| 22. Matching value-item commercial schedule with costs and dependencies | Comply | Financial proposal, value-item schedule | References VC-01 to VC-04 match |
| 23. Complete commercial schedules, assumptions and exclusions | Comply | Slides 69, 70, and the financial proposal | |
| 24. Intellectual-property, source-file and account-control compliance | Comply | Slides 68, 95 | Thara holds all credentials throughout |
| 25. Training, warranty, support, exit and transition compliance | Comply | Slides 68, 95 | Ninety-day website warranty |
| 26. Three relevant client references and verified case studies | Comply | Slides 99 to 134 and the eligibility pack | |
| 27. Conflict-of-interest and competing-account disclosure | Comply | Slide 135 | |
| 28. Bank-guarantee undertaking and eligibility | Comply | Procurement eligibility pack | Signed undertaking accompanies the bid |
No requirement is marked Do Not Comply. Items 12, 13, 15 and 16 relate to the optional Package 2, which is not submitted. | |||






























